• Happy Birthday, Nicholas Katzenbach, my old boss (1922-2012)! ⚖️

T-Satellite

For 50 years I wandered in remote Adirondack wilderness areas, mostly far from any trail with only a map, compass, a standard wrist watch, and a bit of experience. My wife has a written itinerary and local DEC forest rangers who I knew, knew generallly where I was going, although I often made small changes while enroute. Funny how I survived all of that for so many years. Not that it could not happen, but I never got "lost" or hurt. Then at first, I when on a SAR incident, I only added a GPS with a radio on DEC frequency as a necessary part of the job. But since the DEC has recently transitioned to primary navigation using Caltopo on cell phones, I must also now reluctantly carry that device now when on SAR. But a map and compass is always also with me.
 
Not too many places in the Adirondacks you can't get out from in a day walking, and their are marked trails. Not so in BWCAW and Quetico. And just looking at the trip from Minnesota to Hudson Bay.
 
Not too many places in the Adirondacks you can't get out from in a day walking, and their are marked trails. Not so in BWCAW and Quetico. And just looking at the trip from Minnesota to Hudson Bay.
I have always spent my time bushwhacking mainly between remote western Adirondack area ponds, with or without a Hornbeck in my company and the lowland ridges in the Pepperbox, Five Ponds, Pigeon Lake, Ha-De-Ron-Dah, and West Canada Lake wilderness areas. I am not a peak bagger by any means and tend to avoid those overcrowded areas and trails.

 
For 50 years I wandered in remote Adirondack wilderness areas, mostly far from any trail with only a map, compass, a standard wrist watch, and a bit of experience
When the men at Monet found out I was using a compass and maps, they were as surprised as if I said I was using witchcraft
I respect the no tech in the back country and practice it with exception of communication for my wife.

I made the mistake once of taking my cell phone and having it on. Sitting on the shore at South end Bald Eagle I got a business call. Ended up an hour long meeting. It was unique and doing it once, showing the people what I was looking at, had its charm. Turned it off and never turn on cell service in trips there after. I take a pocket watch that I rarely look at; a head lamp I almost never use - some trips not once; and an old super cheap Garmin GPS: gives me latitude and longitude, time, sunrise, and sunset. It only comes out once or twice in a trip.
I agree.
 
In 1988 I was on a horse packing trip in Wyoming east of Yellowstone NP in the Absaroka Range. We were in 50 miles from the nearest dirt road. We had no cell phones then. I got bucked off a horse. I was not seriously injured, but what if I was? That one still haunts me all of these years later. Sat coverage is good. I plan to use it.
 
When the men at Monet found out I was using a compass and maps, they were as surprised as if I said I was using witchcraft
For many years, I taught land navigation to young wilderness guides in training. Some got it, others struggled (a lot). There was no greater feeling of pride than to teach proper procedures and then to observe a student under test do it properly and successfully and to lead a group to a specific point destination. Magical.
 
My main hiking partner is a true Luddite who refuses to use a phone or GPS in his car or on the trail. I'm fine with map and compass being the primary navigation tools on the trail but having a device tucked away that can save the day just seems like common sense. No need to have your nose in it continuously - but in the pack for those times when weather and visibility make a map difficult or impossible. Funny story... my wife and I were on a two month cross country RV trip with him and his significant other last summer. It was very common for my wife and I to arrive at a campground and an hour or two later get a phone call that they were lost. Despite the numerous times I texted his SO a Google Maps pin to lead them to the campground they'd still get lost the next time we moved. He refused to use a GPS or phone and she refused to use a map. I know we got by fine with an atlas back in the day but why not use a modern tool that makes life easier? Plus road maps seem to be so much less accurate than they were pre-GPS. At least good quality topo maps for hiking are still available.
 
having a device tucked away that can save the day just seems like common sense.
Oh, I think anyone who goes very deep into the woods these days without some way to send an SOS is taking unnecessary risks. (I just don't want cell service or interweb connectivity out there but YMMV)

A close friend of mine is the founder of the Fowler-O'Sullivan Foundation, a non-profit that promotes hiker safety on the Pacific Crest Trail. They give away (I think 15-20) inReaches to thru-hikers every year and can document at least 10 instances where hikers attributed their safe extraction to those little pieces of tech.
 
Oh, I think anyone who goes very deep into the woods these days without some way to send an SOS is taking unnecessary risks. (I just don't want cell service or interweb connectivity out there but YMMV)

A close friend of mine is the founder of the Fowler-O'Sullivan Foundation, a non-profit that promotes hiker safety on the Pacific Crest Trail. They give away (I think 15-20) inReaches to thru-hikers every year and can document at least 10 instances where hikers attributed their safe extraction to those little pieces of tech.
Yeah but just about anyone can step onto the PCT and with such a low bar I’m sure many are going to get themselves in trouble.

The wilderness first aid course I took said the vast majority of emergencies were day hikers who had no maps, no warm clothing, etc. or people who just stepped off the trail, or whatever.

I had a friend in college that went on a far north trip: 3 canoes, six people. They wrapped one canoe. They could only take out 5 people plus gear - there were 30 days more of the trip. They left my friend with tent, sleeping bag and 30 days food. He had no way of knowing when the others could get out and how long a rescue might take.

We really are spoiled wimps. I’m not saying we shouldn’t be safe or not take communication. But we are really more likely to get ourselves killed in a car than on a canoe trip.
 
No need to have your nose in it continuously - but in the pack for those times when weather and visibility make a map difficult or impossible.

That does make sense, especially as we get older or are a long time out on a particularly difficult route. I would not be opposed otherwise to that and have done it myself, reluctantly. But for some, the temptation to haul it out is just too great, and to "cheat" when you find yourself asking the "big question" rather than to gain valuable experience for when the dang thing breaks or runs out of juice. I have failed to certify guide students in land navigation who were leading a bushwhack trek who did just that, thinking I did not see them sneak a look in their pocket.

In my land navigation training class, I show a video of a line of young kids who are marching along single file in open air with their faces glued to a GPS (or maybe it is a cell phone). But there is just one girl who is obviously looking around, head on a swivel as they travel. IMO she is the only one who is enjoying their hike and could describe the landscape of where they are and where they have been. It is a perfect example.

Before I was old enough to hunt myself, I would go with my dad who had a favored off trail woods route that he grew up with many years before. He showed me favored landmarks of how to get from one navigation fixed point to the next, which eventually ended up as my deer watch locations when I got old enough to carry a gun myself.

“Now here is that twisted tree where you turn left and head over the ridge saddle to the south. Find the creek, had downstream and cross at the second sharp bend, then head west past the collapsed cabin remains to the overhanging rock shelter by the rusty milk can. I’ll give you about 20-30 minutes to get there.”

Later, when I was old enough to carry a gun on the hunt, I knew exactly where to go, step by recognized step. To this day I sometimes still hike in that area for old time’s sake, and can still hear my dad’s advising voice. “If you get “mixed up” (he never said “lost”), just sit down on a log, have a drink, eat half of your sandwich, and think about how you got there. Does anything in the landscape look familiar? If not, look at your compass and backtrack to the creek and I will find you.”

Whatever happened to those days and that kind of sage advice?
Years later I was hiking with a fellow wilderness guide instructor and land navigation expert mentor. He had an early hand-held GPS at the time. Struggling through derecho major blowdown we sat for a minute and he was proud to show me on his GPS where we were. I said "no, Van, that is not correct." Just look around, and you will see the spur downslope of the ridge just behind us, and the lake is just becoming visible between the trees to our left. I pointed to a distinct location on the topo map: we are exactly here instead". So then Van said "you are correct". He put his GPS away and did not look at it again.

So to me, the journey itself is more of the goal than the destination itself may be. Finding my way by being smart and using traditional tools is what keeps me happy.

Of course I do carry and use a GPS (and Caltopo) as is required for exacting precision during a SAR incident mission, but when I am recreational traveling alone myself in the woods, I am comfortable with and prefer older methods that work well for me to find any destination I choose in the distance . I enjoy keeping myself sharp with the skill I learned so long ago.
 
Last edited:
So to me, the journey itself is more of the goal than the destination itself may be. Finding my way by being smart and using traditional tools is what keeps me happy.
I learned much from my mycology professor. Mushroom hunters wander around in the forests, get distracted by an unusual or tasty mushroom and can get lost. Dr. Lowe told us to never panic, but to set our collecting basket down and carefully walk an outward spiral, always keeping your basket In sight. He said you will soon come upon something you recognize and can make your way back.

Tom Brown describes an exercise where he takes students to a woods that is squared off a mile on each side by roads. The students are to walk into the woods for 20 minutes and then walk back out. Invariably, he says, they all get lost. He, or perhaps it was others, counsel to look back as well as look forward, so you know what to look for on the way back. I think the Davidson and Rugge book also describes the process in terms of portaging.

I taught my foster daughter as much as I could in the 6 years I had her. The court returned her to her biological family. We met again when she was an adult and she told me, “I remember what you said. You told me to always look back when I’m walking in the woods to see where I’ve been.” I couldn’t have been more grateful for that moment.
 
Back
Top Bottom