• Happy Mountain Day! 🇯🇵 🏔️🌄

In defense of dams, which U.S. canoeists should worship!

Glenn MacGrady

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
6,981
Reaction score
14,523
Location
NW Connecticut
Dams have been unfairly and unwisely d*mned, including on this site.

Without dams, both the lentic and lotic canoeing waters of the USA would be impoverished.

Let's start with extreme lotic waters: whitewater rivers. Without dams, whitewater runs for normal paddlers would be limited to a narrow window between the gullywashing torrents of peak runoffs of spring and the bony rock gardens of summer and fall. Dam releases provide predictable and safe levels for whitewater canoeing throughout the year, all over the country.

The importance of dams for lake/lentic canoeing is even more dramatic. The only places in the USA that have a high percentage of natural lakes are the northern states that were glaciated during the last Ice Age and Florida. The rest of the USA's lentic canoeing waters rely on dams—from picturesque mill ponds, to swamps like Sparkleberry, to large lakes. In a 2012 assessment of 111,119 lakes in the USA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimated that 52% are natural and 48% are manmade.

Maryland has zero, zip, nada, no natural lakes. Texas has only one large natural lake. Delaware has at most two. Other than in the formerly glaciated northern tier of states and Florida, the vast majority of lakes in every state are manmade. DAM CREATIONS! Here is the EPA's distribution map of natural vs. manmade lakes in the USA's Lower 48:

1786410471433.png

For lentic water paddlers who like to travel by bush plane, Alaska has about 3 million natural lakes. Hawaii has only five.

Virtually all the lakes and ponds I paddle in Connecticut are dammed.

For the dam busters among us (with all due respect to the RAF's Operation Chastise), remember that busting dams en masse will bust U.S. canoeing en masse.

Maybe that's why god invented Canada.
 
There are some undammed stretches of river that are canoeable most of the year, sometimes even in both directions. The Teton has no impoundment dams (well, we tried). I just got back from paddling some of the upper valley stretch, going upstream and down in late summer flows. I saw no evidence of high spring floods.

The Salmon (aka River of No Return) is navigable for the whitewater capable most of the year. The South Fork of the Payette runs all summer. Neither are controlled by dams.

Large natural lakes...we have four. Pend Oreille, Bear Lake, Coeur d'Alene, and Priest Lake.

Three others are of significant size (4,000 to 6,000 acres) - Henrys Lake, Payette Lake, and Hayden Lake.

Besides that, the Snake River below Shoshone Falls is largely spring fed year-round, to the tune of about 5'000 cfs.

There are numerous other rivers with upper reaches that are navigable (especially if you're a poler) all through summer in most years
That's just Idaho. I know there are some as well in neighboring states. I'm not sure how much I would really miss dams in the PNW..... assuming we made up the loss with nuclear power.
 
Last edited:
Florida has a lot of natural lakes and many of the spring fed rivers are not dammed. Fisheating Creek is not dammed but only because angry citizens objected. The further south you do, the more dams and other impediments impair water flow.
 
Coal, steel, grains, gravel/sand, and other heavy materials still move around central US on large rivers and these remain navigable for barges most of the year only because of dams and locks.

I once took a river trip on the Scioto and Ohio rivers. Many large tows of barges on the Ohio and the shore has many terminals to transfer to and from railroads or other land transport.

OTOH, the map above shows 2 natural lakes in Ohio while Wikipedia lists 13 natural lakes larger than 100 acres. Maybe different criteria for "natural"?
 
Back
Top Bottom