As with many aging canoeists, we're considering replacing one of our canoes with something lighter. We have a 18.5' Wenonah Odyssey and a 16' Curtis Northstar and it's tough deciding which to replace because they're both great canoes that complement each other well, and, there's not that much difference in weight, about 3 pounds. But we could shave 15 to 20 pounds off the weight by updating to a lightweight layup.
So, I'm looking for opinions and perspectives on a Northstar Polaris to replace the Curtis Northstar or the Northstar Boreas to replace the Wenonah Odyssey.
Realistically we'd probably get more benefit from replacing our Curtis Northstar because we use it more often and it is a few pounds heavier than the Odyssey. I'm considering the Polaris as a replacement because of its narrow width (31" gunnel/34.5" max) for paddling efficiency and the useable rocker (2.5" bow/1.5" stern) for maneuvering in tight spaces and moving water. Other than the asymmetrical rocker, the Polaris sounds similar to the Curtis Northstar.
But I do wonder about the seaworthiness and stability of the Polaris in comparison to the Northstar. It has similar dimensions but I get the impression that the Polaris has a more rounded hull and is perhaps more tender. We both feel very comfortable being on the water in wind and waves with the Northstar, so is the Polaris comparably stable?
As for the Northstar Boreas, it's nine inches shorter than the Odyssey and has some rocker so should be more maneuverable but still carry a load efficiently, making the Boreas a more versatile canoe. Perhaps we'd take it out and paddle it more than we do the Odyssey.
Any thoughts are appreciated!
PS: The other canoes I've considered are the Swift Keewaydin 16 (35 lbs in Kevlar layup; 33 lbs in carbon!) to replace the Curtis Northstar and the 17' 5" GRB Traveler II (35 lbs!) to replace the Odyssey.
So, I'm looking for opinions and perspectives on a Northstar Polaris to replace the Curtis Northstar or the Northstar Boreas to replace the Wenonah Odyssey.
Realistically we'd probably get more benefit from replacing our Curtis Northstar because we use it more often and it is a few pounds heavier than the Odyssey. I'm considering the Polaris as a replacement because of its narrow width (31" gunnel/34.5" max) for paddling efficiency and the useable rocker (2.5" bow/1.5" stern) for maneuvering in tight spaces and moving water. Other than the asymmetrical rocker, the Polaris sounds similar to the Curtis Northstar.
But I do wonder about the seaworthiness and stability of the Polaris in comparison to the Northstar. It has similar dimensions but I get the impression that the Polaris has a more rounded hull and is perhaps more tender. We both feel very comfortable being on the water in wind and waves with the Northstar, so is the Polaris comparably stable?
As for the Northstar Boreas, it's nine inches shorter than the Odyssey and has some rocker so should be more maneuverable but still carry a load efficiently, making the Boreas a more versatile canoe. Perhaps we'd take it out and paddle it more than we do the Odyssey.
Any thoughts are appreciated!
PS: The other canoes I've considered are the Swift Keewaydin 16 (35 lbs in Kevlar layup; 33 lbs in carbon!) to replace the Curtis Northstar and the 17' 5" GRB Traveler II (35 lbs!) to replace the Odyssey.
Last edited: