• Happy Mathematics Day! ❌📐♾️

Which Canoe Should I Take?

Joined
Aug 26, 2025
Messages
2
Reaction score
6
Location
Central Pa
Hi all: I am a retired vet, looking for some advice as to which of my canoes others think I should take on a full-length solo 444 mile river paddle of the Susquehanna.
I plan to do it in the spring when the water is up and moving, but not flooding. I plan to camp, except maybe first night or two, depending on support.
There are lots of towns along the route, so packing grub is not a big issue.
I am very experienced in ww creek and river paddling, both in kayak and canoe.
I grew up on the Sus-q river, with lots of activities from the spring-thaw to ice-over, my entire life.
A friend and I took my Penobscot on a late April, high-flow 2.5 day, 100 mile float down the Sus-q west branch remote section last year from below Curwensville Dam to takeout above Lock Haven.
I have a canoe cart for portage of the numerous dams and a small sailing rig for the slow stretches, wind permitting, that I will likely take.

Canoes from which to choose:

16' Royalex Old Town Penobscot 34" beam, 65 lbs with skid plates

16' Royalex Mohawk Intrepid 36" beam, 73 lbs

15' Royalite Dagger Reflection 35" beam, 63 lbs with center seat and skid plates

Priority is mostly speed and comfort. I probably will pull seats not needed.

I have a good idea which one to use, but I am looking for other trippers who have used these canoes or padded with others using them to evaluate solo speed/comfort/paddability for a couple-week trip.

For those unfamiliar with the Sus-q, there is very little ww at normal levels and I would not expect anything much above a brief 2, unless I would seek it out.

Some will likely suggest buying a 35 pound kevlar boat, and that would be great, but unless someone gives me one, that is not an option.

On a side note, my great uncle did this trip in 1920. I still have his log with pics.
I have been wanting to do this trip for 50 years, but life has a way of getting in the way. I now have a narrow window of time in which to complete it.
Thanks,
Randy
 
I've had a couple of 16 Penobscots, and it's a nice river tourer, probably the fastest (i.e. most efficient) Royalex canoe out there. I've also paddled some pretty big whitewater in it: solo it's a cork. I put in a solo seat just aft of the middle and removed the others--saves on weight, but added a wood thwart at one of the seat positions (just a 1x2 if I remember correctly). It's narrow enough that a bent shaft amidships is useable (I went up 2"). Sounds like a fun trip, especially with the history.
 
I grew up on the Susquehanna too and think that is a fine goal. I did my first trip there in '76. I like big boats so I would probably take one of the 16 footers. I never paddled any of the boats, but checked out their specs. I"d be mainly concerned about wind and avoid the Penobscot at 14 inches deep. If you are a light guy with a light load the 15 footer might be your best bet.

Keep us informed as your plans develop, it sounds interesting.
 
My vote would be for the Penobscot. I haven't paddled the other two, but I had a Penobscot that I paddled solo and poled. It did fine in short class 2 drops, but that was without a tripping load. Just the same, I think it would be fine with a reasonable load paddled solo. Pretty sure it's going to be more efficient on the flats. Easier to pick up and carry too.
 
Back
Top Bottom