• Happy Discovery of King Tut's Tomb (1922)! 👑⚰️

Marc Ornstein: "FUNCTIONAL vs INTERPRETIVE FreeStyle Canoeing"

Glenn MacGrady

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
6,515
Reaction score
5,982
Location
Connecticut
"Most freestyle techniques developed from a functional standpoint. The various techniques/maneuvers being used to navigate lakes and streams. On narrow, twisty streams or crenulated shores, freestyle shines. The movements of the paddle, paddler and the canoe are fluid, seamless and efficient."

Essay with photos and videos: http://freestylecanoeing.com/functional-vs-interpretive-freestyle-canoeing/
 
Is there a difference between "functional freestyle" (a relatively new term I think) and just plain paddling where you do whatever you want which might include some full or partial strokes that have freestyle names? I love navigating twisty streams full of downfall and choosing strokes unconsciously and my version of unconstrained paddling can even include paddling on both sides (I'm somewhat ambidextrous) which is apparently a freestyle no-no. Is functional freestyle more constrained than just paddling?
 
Is there a difference between "functional freestyle" (a relatively new term I think) and just plain paddling where you do whatever you want...?
Perhaps Marc Ornstein will chime in but for me the difference between functional freestyle and functional paddling is that when I'm paddling in "freestyle" mode I make a game of executing a range of paddling strokes, including some that I might not ordinarily use when out canoeing to get somewhere. I'll purposefully aim for obstacles just to practice cleanly getting through or around them with a range of maneuvers or enter dead ends to practice backing out of them with reverse maneuvers. But I suppose it becomes a matter of semantics depending on context because when out for the day in my sport canoe I don't conscientiously switch between functional freestyle and functional paddling.

I'm going to try paddling freestyle to music next summer because it looks like fun and has been suggested as a way to slow my pace (my need for speed) even when paddling functional freestyle. And linking efficient paddling strokes is a good way to improve proficiency and get a better feel for the connection between the water, the blade, and how the canoe responds.

...paddling on both sides (I'm somewhat ambidextrous) which is apparently a freestyle no-no.
I believe the distinction is that when doing an interpretive or competitive freestyle performance the paddling is done from the dominant side to showcase the different onside and offside maneuvers. I'm fairly ambidextrous so when I'm out canoeing functional freestyle I switch sides occasionally to keep my joint and muscle ailments balanced out.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Marc Ornstein will chime in but for me the difference between functional freestyle and functional paddling is that when I'm paddling in "freestyle" mode I make a game of executing a range of paddling strokes, including some that I might not ordinarily use when out canoeing to get somewhere. I'll purposefully aim for obstacles just to practice cleanly getting through or around them with a range of maneuvers or enter dead ends to practice backing out of them with reverse maneuvers. But I suppose it becomes a matter of semantics depending on context because when out for the day in my sport canoe I don't conscientiously switch between functional freestyle and functional paddling.

I'm going to try paddling freestyle to music next summer because it looks like fun and has been suggested as a way to slow my pace (my need for speed) even when paddling functional freestyle. And linking efficient paddling strokes is a good way to improve proficiency and get a better feel for the connection between the water, the blade, and the canoe.


I believe the distinction is that when doing an interpretive or competitive freestyle performance the paddling is done from the dominant side to showcase the different onside and offside maneuvers. I'm fairly ambidextrous so when I'm out canoeing functional freestyle I switch sides occasionally to keep my joint and muscle ailments balanced out.
I like your interpretation because it sounds like pure upside potential. I'm not sure why I don't spent more time practicing freestyle moves but I think lack of patience may be part of it. Incorporating practice into regular paddling (more consciously) is probably a good idea for me since my rare freestyle practice sessions tend to be short since I'm anxious to go paddling. :)
 
I love navigating twisty streams full of downfall and choosing strokes unconsciously and my version of unconstrained paddling
Exactly, same here. To have the muscle memory from having learned some of those "lesser used" strokes that you may have practiced in freestyle mode, is what makes effective functional paddling functional. I have always thought linking varieties of strokes is the key to make the boat perform exactly as desired. The more you know, the more you know and can do, even without thinking through the details of "which stroke will get me through this situation". I liken it to riding a fast bicycle on a gravel road full of pot holes.

To Marc"s statement: "Freestyle is a canoeing discipline that emphasizes the entirety of the connection between the boat (canoe), the body (the paddler) and the blade (the paddle)", I will add the water to that list. A long term instructor I know often states "get your head in the water" when learning how to control your boat. Not literally, of course, but virtually, to understand what is going on with forces on entire system.
 
Last edited:
Is there a difference between "functional freestyle" (a relatively new term I think) and just plain paddling where you do whatever you want which might include some full or partial strokes that have freestyle names? I love navigating twisty streams full of downfall and choosing strokes unconsciously and my version of unconstrained paddling can even include paddling on both sides (I'm somewhat ambidextrous) which is apparently a freestyle no-no. Is functional freestyle more constrained than just paddling?
As to "functional" being a relatively new term, it is, sort of. As I understand it, the early development of freestyle (originally called sport paddling) was entirely functional. Along the way, the public perception of the genre, influenced heavily by videos, became synonymous with the interpretive side of the sport. I felt that it was important to recenter that image and thus began adding the modifier, "functional", to differentiate between it and the "interpretive" version.
As for "paddling on both sides" by which I assume you mean, swapping grip and hand positions as the paddle crosses to the opposite side, there is no prohibition against that. In a competition, one would need to note that on their written routine (which is submitted to the judges prior to the competition) likely with an explanation as to why they are doing so but in the functional realm, one may do as they please. I personally frown upon it, in a general sense, because every time one switches hands, there is a moment during which he/she may loose control of the canoe. If the switch takes place in a calm situation, simply for the purpose of exercising different muscles, no problem. If it is done in a dicey situation, because the paddler is uncomfortable with using an appropriate cross maneuver, that (in my opinion) is OK as well however, it would be an advantage to develop the necessary cross side skills to avoid such needs, in the future.
 
When i am coaching freestyle I try to keep the clients/coachees/ paddlers stick to 1 side so their learning curve is the steepest and their other side is to.me homework. As an ambidexter i can do both sides reasonably so on many occasions i do my demo's both sides if i think they can handle that. When they ask me i certainly do their side in the demo.

After the rise of Jessica Fox and many other men and women in C1 slalom. I am a firm believer in switching sides whenever you think it is better. Sometimes i even switch so i can make a crossbow draw as i think that biomachanic is much better to prefend shoulder enjury.

Me only recorded performance on music was is some regards pretty bad.
But i got bored halveway and chanced sides.

I never did a freestyle competition because :
a they do not exist on this continent.
B I have not learnd to to learn a routine.
 
Last edited:
Most folks who learn freestyle canoeing techniques do so exclusively for their functionality. They simply want to become better paddlers and have no intention of ever doing an interpretive routine.


That would be me. I'm not even a little bit interested in performing interpretive freestyle, but I appreciate those who do and those who post the videos. They have been very instructional for those of us far removed from any personal coaching. Those techniques I have been able to pick up to some degree have been very useful in my typical paddling on meandering streams and the edgewaters of lakes where I do a lot of my fishing and photography.

To Marc"s statement: "Freestyle is a canoeing discipline that emphasizes the entirety of the connection between the boat (canoe), the body (the paddler) and the blade (the paddle)", I will add the water to that list. A long term instructor I know often states "get your head in the water" when learning how to control your boat. Not literally, of course, but virtually, to understand what is going on with forces on entire system.
I agree. I spend a lot of time on the long flat stretches of the Snake River here in Idaho. The river has a lot of meanders and islands that effect current, and they are obvious. What isn't obvious is the river bottom that changes shape and depth, sometimes dramatically. The river cuts through a lot of geologically recent volcanic terrain. Without much fall in the river, the powerful current sends boils and eddies up from the bottom in places that one wouldn't expect if just looking at the features above and just below the water. Quite often, the current changes direction - even reverses - with barely a ripple at the surface. Sometimes , a whirlpool materializes just ahead where none existed. While not much of an issue regarding avoidance of obstacles, reading those subtle changes and having the moves makes a big difference in how easily one gets down (or up) the river.
 
After the rise of Jessica Fox and many other men and women in C1 slalom. I am a firm believer in switching sides whenever you think it is better.

We are drifting away from flat water freestyle, but switching hands is an important functional paddling issue. Lennart's reference is that many top whitewater slalom racers now switch hands at appropriate times to get the best leverage, force and efficiency for the next upcoming slalom gate, given the changing water architecture. In days past, we learned "never" to switch hands in whitewater.

I changed my mind about that in 1987 when paddling on Section IV of the Chattooga River with Nolan Whitesell. Nolan, to our surprise, would tactically switch hands in the flats between class 3, 4 and 5 rapids if they were significantly "lefty" or "righty" rapids. Or he'd switch sides in an eddy in the middle of a long rapid if the next upcoming move was more efficiently paddled lefty or righty. He could paddle any rapid on either side—and, of course, he had cross strokes from either side—but some rapids and moves therein are definitely easier if you paddle them lefty or righty. Nolan could also roll with a paddle or just with his hands lefty or righty, and do both on-side and cross-side rolls with paddle or hands.

Most non-freestyle flat water paddling is simply forward stroking. I switch sides occasionally when doing that, especially as my body has aged, simply to exercise the muscles on both sides of my body and to avoid muscle/tendon strains (as I currently now have in my right forearm) from correcting too much on one side only. I also paddle hit & switch from my kneeling position in certain situations when I need more velocity, such as during long crossings in winds or paddling up-current in rivers.

Finally, to get back to the question of the difference between functional freestyle flat water paddling and just regular tripping flat water paddling, I agree with @tketcham. When day paddling, just for fun and to break up the monotony, I'll deliberately try using different moves to get around trees, branches, and other obstacles. I'll also deliberately try different ways to go around a bend on a twisty stream.

For example, if I'm faced with making a sharp turn around an off-side bend, my earliest (childhood) instinct would have been to use a sweep stroke. But that might cause me to slide to the outside too much in strong currents. Later, mainly from whitewater training in the early 80s, I learned to make the turn with a cross-draw followed by cross-forward strokes. About the same time, I learned the benefit of heeling the hull to the inside or outside of the turn, depending on the "preference" of the hull's architecture. Finally, about 16 years ago at freestyle instructionals, I learned the highly leveraged benefits of making that off-side turn with a wedge or inverted wedge (aka bow jam).

There is a similar panoply of on-side turning manuevers, which are fun to alternate, play with, and hence practice. I find that each one can have slightly more or less benefits in certain situations.

To me, variety is the spice of canoeing life—namely, variety with different hulls, different paddle shapes, different paddling sides, different paddling techniques, different moves, and different waters in different places.
 
The movements of the paddle, paddler and the canoe are fluid, seamless and efficient."
"Freestyle" is a broad term. It shouldn't matter if you're tripping, paddling twisty streams or whatever, the above statement should be your goal. Learning those Functional moves will just make you better and more efficient. Not to mention it'll make paddling more interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom