Wenonah and paddling technique

Glenn MacGrady

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
540
Location
Connecticut
Here is a direct link to the particular article I believe Mason is recommending:


I'll just add that, even if you are not a racer as I am not, you can still prefer a bent shaft for straight-ahead correction stroke paddling; that you can use sit & switch technique from a bench seat canoe; and that you can kneel and do correction stroke technique off of some bucket seats, such as the Harold Deal bucket seat on the Hemlock SRT -- all of which I do regularly.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Here's an excellent piece on why Wenonah canoes are the way they are, and provides a good discussion of sit-and-switch paddling.

https://kitchi-gami.com/
I've had two Wenonah solos and always used the sit and switch. with them I just couldn't get a solo to go straight with a J or C stroke.
But it's kind of annoying having to switch sides so often. I have a new solo and next summer I really want to learn how to keep it going straight without switching sides. Speed isn't everything. I had sliding bucket seats on both Wenonah's and it really spoiled me. Being able to change trim on the fly is really handy.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
467
Location
Anchorage Alaska / Pocono Mts.
I think the Wenona bucket seats are comfortable, they hold me in place and I can get a pretty powerful stroke even w/o the foot brace. I only have straight paddles and never tried a bent so can't comment on them being better. If I paddled that boat more I might go to a shorter paddle. The one thing I liked about the bucket seats for tandem was that it kept my wife in the center and I wasn't always counterbalancing the boat. She was also less fidgety.

Like Mason said, switching sides becomes mindless after you've done it enough. But interesting to me is that I find it takes way more thought and concentration and is less repetitive and monotonous than using correction strokes. I do both and enjoy both depending on conditions ,goals or mood.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
527
Location
NW Iowa
I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one to find the bucket seats comfortable.
Like others have said I do both but generally prefer sit and switch, however I seem to be the opposite of lowangle al in that I find sit and switch to be more mindless than correction strokes, at least if I want to move relatively fast.
If I'm paddling all day there will be extended periods where I'll move to the Canadian stroke and single side it while I cruise along and admire the scenery and daydream.
Eventually I'll want to move a little faster and then the Canadian stroke takes more of my concentration and feels less efficient (technique breaking down I'm sure) but I can move to sit and switch which propels me faster and keeps my mind thinking about other things.
If I want to go faster yet then I need to allocate more brain power my stroke and daydreaming takes a back seat.
It's nice to be able to change gears throughout the day, both mentally and physically.

Alan
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
527
Location
NW Iowa
Now I took the time to actually read the article. I thought it was very good and mirrors my thoughts on paddling very closely.
Thanks for sharing!

Alan
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
467
Location
Anchorage Alaska / Pocono Mts.
Like others have said I do both but generally prefer sit and switch, however I seem to be the opposite of lowangle al in that I find sit and switch to be more mindless than correction strokes, at least if I want to move relatively fast.
If I'm paddling all day there will be extended periods where I'll move to the Canadian stroke and single side it while I cruise along and admire the scenery and daydream.
I probably think more when switching sides because I'm typically in a big empty boat and do it when it's windy especially.

Like you I'll change between the two, going to correction strokes for a "break" and to enjoy the scenery and daydream. Both styles can take a lot of focus in tough conditions or they can be the thing for blissful daydreaming when the going is easy.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
407
Reaction score
201
Location
Bozeman, MT
With an 11 oz paddle (heavy by Zaveral standards), it's a toss up whether even one J stroke is worth it. A flick of the wrist and you're paddling on the other side with no loss of momentum. And I can go as slow as I want.
This summer on the Noatak I purposefully spent a lot of time straight-shafting--probably at least 300 of the 400 miles. I was trying to emulate the stern man in the other boat, who is an exclusive straight shafter. While comfortable with a straight shaft, I have a long ways to go to match his efficiency. Except when needed, I'm a die hard bent shafter from a short racing heritage, including gunkholing.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2012
Messages
725
Reaction score
103
Location
Western Adirondacks
I've been a racer for 25 years and of course my team and of course always use the "hit and switch" paddling technique using carbon bent shaft paddles. I have two Wenonah canoes, a Minnesota II and a Monarch, both are of similar design and similar performance with sliding (fore and aft) adjustable seats. There is another kind of sliding seat that I have used in canoes with more than two seats (C4 and voyageur) that you will see used in racer's canoes. For all except the bow and stern paddler, the mid section paddlers in stock fixed centerline mounted bucket seats are at a great disadvantage. They have to reach out with relatively long shaft paddles to reach the water. Not very ergonomic. As a result, their stroke has an inefficient sweep stroke component that is very wasteful of energy both to them and to the boat's forward motion. Best and fastest performance is obtained with the paddle shaft vertical in the water close to the gunwale, and power delivered parallel to the boat central axis and desired direction of motion. That is much easier on paddlers muscles also, particularly during a hundred-mile day.

So C4 and voyageur canoe racers have developed ways of mounting seats that will easily slide sideways with the paddlers hip moving gunwale to gunwale with very little effort on each hut. Early designs mounted bucket seats on wheels rolling side to side on channels in a flat bench. Later designs now use polished sleeves sliding on strong teflon coated tubes. (One of my early voyageur canoes had flat teflon sheet fixed to the seats. Paddlers wore nylon shorts that slide very easily on teflon.) When a "hut" is called, those mid boat paddlers must move in synchronous coordinated fashion to the opposite sides of the canoe. It has worked very well but the technique means that everyone has to pay close attention to avoid a missed hut call resulting in a potential imbalance disaster (we call it a "bobble"). Sometimes when the wind is blowing hard and waves are breaking, it is hard in seat #2 to hear the stern call the hut. It is calculated that during our Yukon 1000 mile canoe race, each paddler took nearly a third of a million paddle strokes, with approximately 20,000 huts.

one unmentioned disadvantage to the hit and switch technique is the paddle drip on every hut. I'm normally a bow paddler, so my drips go forward, but all paddlers behind me drip in the boat, or on the paddler in front of them when spacing is tight. Those drips add up in the boat hour after hour. Another disadvantage for racers is the first stroke after the hut is not always up to fully efficient power, plus as much as half a stroke time period can be lost during the transiition. Some stern paddlers like to call huts more often than necessary IMO. 8-12 in a C2 seems about right. 16-20 strokes to hut seems about rignt in a c4. In the voyageur we often would go a full 2 minutes, or up to a hundred stokes between huts. Some c2 stern paddlers call hut as often as every 6 strokes, which is far too often and unnecessary to maintain directional control. I feel much as 10% efficiency and power can be lost when calling hut too often. That makes a huge difference in a competitive race. There is nothing to say that every paddler has to hut if a good alert stern paddler alone can take a couple of correction stokes by him or her self on the other side as needed.

I am not normally a solo racer except very rarely. But when I train solo or when recreational paddling solo, I rarely focus on hit and switch, unless you count switching every 15-20 minutes or so that I do for variety or for evening out muscle tone. I get practice enough switching when training with my team or during races. My normal solo power stroke is the pitch, or a very fast J ( both done with a carbon bent) without any hesitation or paddle drag at the end of the stroke. When moving more leisurely, I might morph my J into the Canadian stroke with my spare ottertail paddle just for the enjoyment of that stroke. Or do something else as needed for fun and fine maneuevering control. As the article says, when paddling solo if I really need to move extra quickly for some reason, I might go to hit and switch for fastest sprint like movement, but I don't enjoy doing it.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
495
Reaction score
137
Location
Hoosier State
one unmentioned disadvantage to the hit and switch technique is the paddle drip on every hut. I'm normally a bow paddler, so my drips go forward, but all paddlers behind me drip in the boat, or on the paddler in front of them when spacing is tight. Those drips add up in the boat hour after hour. Another disadvantage for racers is the first stroke after the hut is not always up to fully efficient power, plus as much as half a stroke time period can be lost during the transiition.
Good points!

My normal solo power stroke is the pitch, or a very fast J
Ditto
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
527
Location
NW Iowa
In regards to water dripping in the boat during switches: when I'm tripping or just paddling for fun my switches are slightly slower because instead of bringing the paddle straight up and over I swing the blade out front in an arc so it flings the water over the bow during the switch. This causes me to miss a stroke but keeps the water out. Doesn't work in a head wind though.

Alan
 
Top